vaughnc
07-27-2002, 02:43 AM
If the MPI is just looking at DVI to restrict HQ copying then why would they need to restirict display devices. Let the HQ signal work everywhere except in devices capable of recording at that quality. Require those recorders to be licenced to use the DVI protection scheme to restrict reproduction quality accoring to licence.
This kind of reminds me of Digital audio tape. They wanted us to pay a surcharge on blank media so they could recoupe supposed lost revenues from copying. The big difference here is that they want you to pay a surcharge for the recorder, the STB and the Monitor. Oh yeh, I guess I'll have to pay for the two screens embedded in the back of the headrests in the car if I want them to look good.
How many times do I have to buy a copy of a movie in a different release or media before I own the damn thing? It's the same movie!
This kind of reminds me of Digital audio tape. They wanted us to pay a surcharge on blank media so they could recoupe supposed lost revenues from copying. The big difference here is that they want you to pay a surcharge for the recorder, the STB and the Monitor. Oh yeh, I guess I'll have to pay for the two screens embedded in the back of the headrests in the car if I want them to look good.
How many times do I have to buy a copy of a movie in a different release or media before I own the damn thing? It's the same movie!








