Go Back   HDTVoice.com - High-Definition Television Talk > HDTVoice Discussion > General HDTV Discussion
User Name
Password
Register HDTV FAQ Chatroom HDTV Calendar Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-24-2002, 10:57 PM   #1
robmx
Reged User Tier 2
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 455 robmx is an unknown quantity at this point
Angry censored!

Latest example of censorship on AVSForum.

Anything you read there had to be suspect since you do not know what they edited or deleted. This was deleted today with no comment.

Quote:
Originally posted by sregener

I think it is disingenuous to pretend that Sinclair's actions have had a positive impact on the digital television transition in this country, especially with regards to high definition. Sinclair made no secret that they wanted to use a standard definition signal to broadcast to viewers and then use the remaining bandwidth for mobile applications such as cell phones and pagers.

Quote:
If you think Sinclair is the only broadcaster thinking of doing other things than HDTV you are sadly mistaken. Read this.




All Broadcasters want to Multicast

They argued strongly against the ATSC standard because it was incompatible with their planned use.

Quote:
No, all broadcasters plan on doing other things such as datacasting and multicasting. Sinclair wanted to ensure that we had the best modulation in the US.


That argument led to many broadcasters delaying their purchase of DTV equipment as they waited to see whether the FCC would switch to COFDM.

Quote:
The entire DTV transition was a delaying tactic by the broadcasters to hold on to spectrum. They will use any excuse to delay as long as possible anything that will impinge on their current NTSC cash cow.


It also led many consumers to wait to purchase what could rapidly become obsolete equipment.

Quote:
Most consumers are still postponing the purchase of what could turn out to be obsolete equipment for a number of reasons other than a modulation switch. One would be the changes promised for our current modualtion and another the Hollywood control issues.


If blame should be levied against any one corporation for the delay and confusion over the transition to digital television, it would belong to Sinclair Broadcasting Group. Sorry, but that's just the way it is.


Quote:
I disagree. Sinclair along with Pappas and Granite should be applauded for concentrating on the technology of broadcasting and not caving in even under insane pressure by the special interest in DC. If you want to pick one corporation to blame it would be LG Industries. The CEA would come in a close second. In third place would be the FCC for not being capable of understanding the technology that they are charged with regulating for us.
robmx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2002, 02:20 AM   #2
woodman
Reged User Tier 2
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: So.California
Posts: 196 woodman is on a distinguished road
rob:
This exchange contains statements from people that like to think that they're knowledgeable about DTV and HDTV and all of the technologies that they represent - plus typical idiotic blathering about broadcasting in the USA and how station owners are getting what amounts to "a license to print money". Cash cow indeed! This is downright laughable.

One only has to look at the dreadful state of affairs in the broadcasting industries to see the folly of this sort of thinking. TV stations are now putting their channel logo on screen to remind (and irritate) viewers just what channel they're watching. Re-runs of programs are no longer confined to the summer months as they were in years gone by, they're now a fixture of the entire TV season! Commercial advertising now takes up more of each hour of programming than ever before, and now that PVRs are on the scene, many people are skipping through commercials rather than watching them. Don't think that the advertisers are unaware of this and how it can seriously hamper their message's effectiveness. The end result of all this? Broadcaster's revenues on a slippery slope downhill and gaining momentum.

People talk about broadcasters as though they were just a bunch of greedy *******s, intent on milking their "cash cow" for all it's worth - at the expense of the American taxpayer! To that I can only respond with ha, ha, ha, ha, he,he,he,ho,ho,ho,ho ... and a tear drop.
__________________
woodman

I plan to live forever ..... so far, so good!
Steven Wright
woodman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
DISH Network by DishPronto       Get the package that beats cable!    banner35    Once You Know, You Newegg   



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ?2000 - 2005, HDTVoice.com